§ 01Overview
Byline
Pryce Digital Research
Published
6 October 2026
Sample
12,621 sites · Google Lighthouse mobile
25 May – 5 Sep 2026

The state of Australian small business websites 2026

We ran 12,621 Australian small business websites through Google Lighthouse (mobile), the same test behind Google's own PageSpeed Insights, between 25 May and 5 September 2026. This is what we found.

§ 02Key findings
Median performance score
61
Mean 62.0 · n=12,621
Sites scoring poor (under 50)
27.3%
Lighthouse's own poor band
Pass 2.5s LCP, lab test
11.7%
Median lab LCP 6.9s
Median LCP, lab
6.9s
p75 11.8s
LCP over 4s / over 10s
74.3% / 32.2%
9,374 / 4,062 sites, full sample
Pass 2.5s LCP, real users
59.9%
CrUX field data, n=2,887
Lab vs. real users

Only 11.7% of sites pass the 2.5-second LCP bar under Lighthouse's lab test, against 59.9% among the subset with real Chrome user data (n=2,887, about 23% of the sample). Lighthouse's lab throttling is deliberately harsher than most real connections, and CrUX only reports on sites with enough traffic to measure — so the field number is both more forgiving and biased toward the more established sites in the sample. Neither number is the whole picture on its own.

§ 03Score distribution

Most sites land in the middle, not the bottom

The largest single band is 60–70 (2,635 sites), and the distribution skews toward "needs improvement" rather than outright failure — but a full 27.3% still score under 50, Lighthouse's own poor threshold.

n=12,621
Poor (< 50)Needs improvement (50–89)Good (90+)
Distribution of Lighthouse performance scoresHistogram of Lighthouse mobile performance scores across 12,621 Australian small business websites, grouped into ten-point bins from 0 to 100. Bars are coloured red for the poor band (below 50), light for needs-improvement (50 to 89), and green for good (90 and above).0-105310-2013920-3042630-401,16940-501,65450-602,47460-702,63570-801,41680-901,03490-1001,621Sites (n)Performance score, 0–100
§ 04By platform

Squarespace and Shopify score worst, Wix scores best

Among platforms with at least 100 sites in the sample, WordPress is the largest single group by far (5,554 sites) and sits below the overall mean. "Custom" means no CMS fingerprint was detected — it is a default label, not proof of a hand-built site — and "Unknown" means detection failed outright; both are reported separately and excluded from platform comparisons in our own sales conversations. Framer (n=15) was too thin to chart at this threshold.

n≥100 platforms shown · Framer n=15 excluded (below threshold)
Mean performance score and percentage scoring poor, by platformBar chart comparing mean Lighthouse performance score and the percentage of sites scoring poor, for each website platform with at least 100 sites in the sample: WordPress, Custom, Unknown, Wix, Squarespace, Shopify and Webflow.WordPressn=5,55459.6 mean score28.7% poorCustomn=4,004 · no fingerprint64.9 mean score25.6% poorUnknownn=1,143 · unknown72.2 mean score19.3% poorWixn=70766.1 mean score10.0% poorSquarespacen=52849.4 mean score47.2% poorShopifyn=52751.5 mean score45.9% poorWebflown=14355.9 mean score28.7% poorBoth bars share a 0–100 scale: mean performance score, and % of sites scoring poor.
§ 05By industry

663 distinct industry labels appear in the sample. The ranking below is limited to industries with at least 80 sites, so single unusual results don't skew a small group.

Best 10 by mean score

Best 10 industries by mean Lighthouse performance scoreHorizontal bar chart of the ten highest-scoring industries by mean Lighthouse performance score, among industries with at least 80 sites: Psychologist, IT Consultant, Accountant, Builder, Massage Therapist, Graphic Designer, Conveyancer, Web Designer, Yoga Studio and Lawyer.Psychologist70.0 mean · 19.8% poor · 5.5s median LCP · n=81IT Consultant69.0 mean · 15.9% poor · 4.7s median LCP · n=82Accountant68.9 mean · 14.7% poor · 6.1s median LCP · n=211Builder67.0 mean · 17.5% poor · 5.6s median LCP · n=114Massage Therapist66.8 mean · 20.0% poor · 5.7s median LCP · n=80Graphic Designer66.7 mean · 18.5% poor · 5.8s median LCP · n=108Conveyancer66.6 mean · 23.2% poor · 5.3s median LCP · n=95Web Designer66.3 mean · 18.9% poor · 5.2s median LCP · n=169Yoga Studio66.2 mean · 24.3% poor · 6.2s median LCP · n=107Lawyer65.8 mean · 21.1% poor · 6.3s median LCP · n=114

Worst 10 by mean score

Worst 10 industries by mean Lighthouse performance scoreHorizontal bar chart of the ten lowest-scoring industries by mean Lighthouse performance score, among industries with at least 80 sites: Real Estate, Dentist, Physiotherapy, Day Spa, Mortgage Broker, Car Mechanic, Solar Installer, Kitchen and Bathroom Renovation, Chiropractor and Cleaning Services.Real Estate54.1 mean · 41.1% poor · 8.6s median LCP · n=151Dentist57.1 mean · 36.9% poor · 8.8s median LCP · n=149Physiotherapy59.1 mean · 29.7% poor · 8.0s median LCP · n=118Day Spa59.5 mean · 28.2% poor · 7.3s median LCP · n=117Mortgage Broker60.6 mean · 33.0% poor · 6.6s median LCP · n=109Car Mechanic61.4 mean · 34.0% poor · 6.5s median LCP · n=100Solar Installer61.4 mean · 27.7% poor · 7.8s median LCP · n=101Kitchen & Bathroom Renovation61.6 mean · 25.3% poor · 6.9s median LCP · n=95Chiropractor61.8 mean · 24.3% poor · 7.5s median LCP · n=103Cleaning Services62.5 mean · 28.0% poor · 6.6s median LCP · n=132

Reports by industry

The six largest industries with at least 100 sites each get their own page, with the same numbers set against all sites and against their sector group.

Accountantsn=211 · mean 68.9 · 14.7% poorFinancial plannersn=176 · mean 62.9 · 25.6% poorAir conditioningn=169 · mean 63.3 · 20.1% poorWeb designersn=169 · mean 66.3 · 18.9% poorPsychologists and counsellorsn=166 · mean 63.1 · 15.7% poorCateringn=161 · mean 63.8 · 26.7% poor
§ 06By sector

Retail and real estate trail every other sector

Sites collapse into 12 keyword-matched sector groups. Retail/e-commerce and real estate score lowest and have the highest poor rates; trades and professional services score highest. "Other" is industries that didn't match a keyword rule, not a catch-all judgement.

12 sector groups shown
Mean performance score and percentage scoring poor, by sector groupBar chart comparing mean Lighthouse performance score and percentage of sites scoring poor, across 12 sector groups: trades, other, professional services, health, fitness and wellness, creative and agency, hospitality, home services, automotive, retail and e-commerce, education, and real estate.tradesn=2,04963.4 mean score23.2% poorothern=1,76660.4 mean score31.7% poorprofessional servicesn=1,56064.0 mean score23.7% poorhealthn=1,49861.3 mean score26.2% poorfitness/wellnessn=1,14262.7 mean score27.7% poorcreative/agencyn=90763.8 mean score24.1% poorhospitalityn=86061.6 mean score28.3% poorhome servicesn=83363.4 mean score23.8% poorautomotiven=72360.9 mean score29.3% poorretail/ecommercen=65256.9 mean score37.9% pooreducationn=32660.9 mean score31.0% poorreal estaten=30558.3 mean score35.1% poorBoth bars share a 0–100 scale: mean performance score, and % of sites scoring poor.
§ 07By state

Tasmania scores best of the states we can report

State is derived from the postcode or state text in each business's listed address; 9,572 sites had no derivable state and are excluded here. Only states with at least 100 matched sites are shown — WA, SA and NT were all too thin to publish individually.

n≥100 states shown
Mean performance score and percentage scoring poor, by stateBar chart comparing mean Lighthouse performance score and percentage of sites scoring poor, for the five Australian states and territories with at least 100 matched sites: New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory.NSWn=1,09161.5 mean score30.2% poorQLDn=79360.1 mean score33.4% poorVICn=75860.1 mean score31.9% poorTASn=14164.5 mean score22.7% poorACTn=13161.7 mean score30.5% poorBoth bars share a 0–100 scale: mean performance score, and % of sites scoring poor.

State × industry

A state × industry cell is only published when it holds at least 30 sites. Industry here is the business's own listed category, not the sector groups above. None of the 1,044 combinations across 3,301 state-matched sites gets there — the largest is Plumber in VIC, at n=26 — so no state × industry figure is reported.

Lighthouse mobile performance by state and industry, cells with at least 30 sites
StateIndustrynMedian score% poor (<50)Median LCP
No state × industry cell reaches n≥30.
§ 08What this means

What this means for a business owner

A Lighthouse score in the 50s or 60s does not mean a site is broken. It means the site takes noticeably longer than it should to become usable on an average mobile connection, and that shows up as visitors leaving before the page finishes loading rather than as an obvious fault anyone would notice by eye.

The gap between lab and real-user results in this data is a reminder that a site can look fine to the person who owns it — opened on a fast office connection, on a laptop, on a site they already trust — while performing very differently for a stranger on a phone deciding whether to stay. Median lab load is 6.9 seconds; Google's own threshold for a good result is 2.5.

None of this is platform-proof or industry-proof. Every platform and every industry group in this sample has sites that pass comfortably and sites that fail badly — the averages describe a pattern, not a guarantee. The only way to know where a specific site stands is to test it. Run your own site through the same test.

§ 09Methodology and limitations

Domains are Australian small and medium businesses gathered by Pryce Digital's own lead research (Google Places and Australian Business Register sourced), each run once through Google Lighthouse via the PageSpeed Insights API. This is not a random sample of all Australian websites — it is skewed toward the small local service businesses we prospect (trades, health, hospitality, professional services and similar), and skewed away from large enterprise or purely e-commerce-at-scale sites.

All runs use mobile strategy: mobile emulation with Lighthouse's default network and CPU throttling. Each domain has a single Lighthouse run (the latest successful run when a domain was checked more than once). Individual Lighthouse scores are known to vary run to run, typically by five to ten performance points, from lab network and CPU variance; aggregate statistics across thousands of domains are stable, but no single domain's exact score should be read as precise.

Platform is detected heuristically from HTML, header and asset fingerprints, with a confidence score. We only treat a match at 0.7 confidence or higher as a confirmed CMS. "Custom" (0.4 confidence) means no fingerprint matched — it is not proof of a hand-built site — and "Unknown" (0.0) means detection failed outright.

Page weight statistics (median 5.0 MB) come from a Lighthouse diagnostic that only fires when a page's payload is large enough to warrant a warning, covering just 63 of the 12,621 domains. That is a biased sample of the heaviest pages, not a census of page weight across the study. The LCP-over-4-seconds and LCP-over-10-seconds figures, by contrast, are calculated across the full sample.

Lighthouse's lab Interaction to Next Paint metric was null for every run in this dataset and could not be reported; the field INP figures above come from CrUX only. State is derived from a postcode found in each business's address text, using official Australia Post ranges, falling back to a state-abbreviation word match when no postcode is present. Only states with at least 100 matched domains are published individually.

A field-data flag is set to true for 100% of domains, but the actual Chrome UX Report metrics behind it are only populated for 22.9% (2,887 domains) — the flag defaults true rather than confirming a real match, so only the presence of an actual field metric value should be read as "we have real-user data."

§ 10Use this data

This study is released under CC BY 4.0. Use the numbers and charts freely in your own reporting, with attribution to Pryce Digital, 2026.

Download the raw data (JSON)→

Press enquiries: studio@prycedigital.com

Free audit→Book a call→